Case-based review
Review usually focuses on liability, injuries, treatment, insurance, liens, attorney representation, and whether the claim appears likely to produce a recovery.
CasePayNow resource
CasePayNow helps injured plaintiffs request funding review while a lawsuit or insurance claim is still pending.
Quick guide
Pre-settlement funding may help injured plaintiffs cover urgent expenses while a claim is pending. The decision is based on the case, attorney verification, insurance or recovery path, documentation, prior funding, and the requested amount.
Review usually focuses on liability, injuries, treatment, insurance, liens, attorney representation, and whether the claim appears likely to produce a recovery.
Most providers need your attorney to confirm representation, case status, prior funding, expected recovery path, and whether the requested advance is reasonable.
Before accepting funds, ask how charges are calculated, whether fees grow over time, whether there is a payoff cap, and what examples look like at different timelines.
Approved non-recourse funding is generally repaid from case proceeds if the case is successful, subject to the exact written funding agreement.
How review works
The process usually starts with a short intake, followed by attorney verification, underwriting, written terms, and applicant review before any funds are accepted.
Provide your contact details, case type, attorney information, state, requested amount, and whether you have prior funding.
Your attorney may confirm case facts, treatment, liability, liens, insurance, and current settlement or litigation status.
If approved, review the advance amount, fees, payoff examples, attorney requirements, and case-loss terms before signing.
Submission does not create an obligation. You can decline any offer if the terms do not make sense for your case.
Documents
A complete file reduces back-and-forth. If you do not have every document, give accurate basic details and let the attorney help verify the rest.
Costs and alternatives
Funding can help during a difficult case timeline, but it may cost more than other options if the case takes a long time. Compare payment plans, hardship programs, attorney guidance, insurance benefits, family support, traditional credit, or requesting a smaller advance.
Applicants should ask for payoff examples at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months and should review the funding costs guide, payoff calculator, and contract checklist.
Questions
A credit score is generally not the main review factor. The pending claim, attorney verification, liability, insurance, and expected recovery matter more.
Employment verification is generally not required like a personal loan, but the claim still needs enough support for provider review.
Repayment depends on the written agreement. Many non-recourse agreements are generally repaid from case proceeds if the case succeeds, but applicants should read the exact case-loss language.
Timing depends on documents, attorney response, underwriting, approval, signed terms, and funding method. Same-day funding is possible on some complete files but is not guaranteed.
No. Submission starts a review and does not require you to accept any offer.
Helpful next steps
Before accepting funding
Before signing, understand why attorney verification may be required and use the contract checklist to compare fees, payoff examples, cancellation rights, privacy terms, and case-loss language.
Important limits
Approval is not guaranteed. Funding amounts, timing, fees, state availability, attorney participation, repayment language, and whether funding is non-recourse depend on the case facts, provider review, signed agreement terms, and final approval. Traditional credit and employment are generally not the main review factors, but provider requirements can vary.